Posts

Repetition2

Image
Girl. Boy. Horse. Relationship. Arrows of Stress. Shall I take them as I delivered them to you? Or shall I deliver the initial commonality: genre and gender. These texts have something in common beyond repetition, and maybe that is no coincidence. They have in common the heaviness of expectation. They have in common the resistance to binary thinking. But wait--you might say to me. Aren't they all in the business of emphasizing expectation? Isn't that what repetition does? Doesn't it serve to hammer in all the assumptions, to beat us down with them, to pound home ideas of what a good girl is, how boys become men. Doesn't Bausch's repetition tell us what a heteronormative romantic drama is, how it is scripted and replayed until it is impossible to inhabit? Doesn't Bourgeois explain how stress is attached to a female-coded body and how that stress is dealt with by excision of the head/the mind/the face/the very identity of the body's agent? The answer? I think

Repetition

Image
  What is form? Simply, it is the shape something can take. When we use the word combined with language, the types of shapes we speak of are limited by that content... but the limitation still leaves us with a number of possibilities we could not attend to in our lifetimes. In his seminal biological text "The Origin of the Species," Charles Darwin wrote this about the expansion of formal potential in life:  ...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved. Language is the same. Which is an oversimplification, of course, but also not. When we talk about the shapes of language, we might be talking about its shape in the mouth, or its pattern as sound waves when spoken. We could be speaking of linguistic variation, different language families and their global interpolation, or we could be speaking of words themselves and their look on the p